Introduction: a story of two revolutions

Crypto and Fintech: This picture is from 2016, and India is buzzing about the increase in digital wallet and UPI payments after demonetization. Suddenly it seems normal to pay for a cup of tea with the phone. Fast forward just a few years, and a parallel wave hits: American crypto-trade apps pop up everywhere, giving people a chance to invest in the latest symbols of Bitcoins, Etheriums, or blocks.

Both Fintech and Crypto promised to revolutionize money, but the government of India couldn’t be bothered to see them. While fintech got a warm hug from regulators (thanks to UPI and RBI-supported initiatives), crypto has a lot of rocker traveling between enthusiasm and doubt.

So here’s the big question: Do crypto and fintech actually coexist in India’s regulatory location, or will they be obstacles forever?

Driver Fintech’s dream in India Crypto and Fintech

Let’s appreciate the huge advances fintech has made in India before we reach crypto.

The UPI transaction crossed 14 billion alone in July 2025. This is the adoption of this mind.

Neobanks like FI, Jupiter, and Razorpay change how we see the bank—smooth app instead of long queues in branches.

Small traders, knights, and even street artists now accept the QR code.

This regulator support has been important. RBI and NPCI pushed aggressively for UPI, the government encouraged digital adoption, and the startup was given the opportunity. Result? Fintech feels reliable, safe, and mainstream.

Crypto’s bumpy trip

In 2018, RBI banned the banks from handling cryptopics.

Now the story of crypto in India is like a teenager trying to convince the strict parents that it is “completely safe” to stay out late.

In 2020, the Supreme Court overturned the ban, which gave the region a second life.

In 2021, crypto exchanges such as Wazirx, Coindcx, and Zebpay made millions of users on the ship. Social media was filled with “Bitcoin to the moon” memes.

Where both worlds overlap

Then in 2022, the tax hammer: 30% tax on profits and 1% TDS on each transaction. Overnight, trade volumes fell over 90% on Indian stock exchanges.

Crypto has met constant investigation as regulators are afraid of money laundering, instability, and lack of consumer protection. Unlike Fintech, there is no government-tricky system like UPI for this.

Here is the interesting part: Fintech and crypto are not quite a universe. In fact, they slowly combine in some areas:

• Cross-border payment: Imagine freelancers in India that, instead of waiting for rapid transfer, payment is made in Stabelin immediately. This is action in fintech and crypto.
  
• Property of symbols: Fintech platforms are used with symbols—convert property or bond to digital symbols that are easy to act on.
  
• Blockchain in Banking: Banks and fintech search for blockchain for fraud detection and transparent record chat.
  

Regulatory Balance Act

Here is a million dollars concerned: How will India regulate this coexistence?

Supervisors in India have been cautious for good reasons. Along with 1.4 billion people, even a small economic scam can affect millions of people. This is why fintech apps should follow strict KYC norms, data security rules, and RBI inspections.

However, crypto is boundless and difficult to control. The government does not want to ban the IT-Sum (because of innovation and global competitiveness), but it does not even want a wild western landscape. So India is moving toward a middle route:

• Recognize crypto as a “digital asset,” not a legal tender.
• Search for the central bank’s digital currency (CBDC) as a safe alternative.
• Remember the global structure with G20 land for cryptocurrencies.
  

This approach means that fintech and crypto can occur in coexistence but with very different words: RBI’s welcoming eye under fintech and a strict crypto under the set of developing guidelines.

Real stories from the ground

Let’s get real for a moment.

Take 25-year-old software engineer Rohit in Bangalore. He uses Paytm for groceries, UPI for rent, and Zerodha to invest in stocks. One day he tries to buy Ethereum on a crypto exchange. The process seems exciting but misleading—more wallets, treasures, and values swing. He feels quickly: Fintech makes the money practical, while cryptopenger feels unexpected but like the future.

Or consider Anita, a boutique owner in Delhi. He adopted the QR code under Kovid and doubled the sale for UPI. When a friend asked him to accept the crypto payment, he laughed at him, “Who would buy clothes with Bitcoin in India? I want the money I can spend tomorrow.”

Conclusion: Not a rival but unpleasant neighbor

So can crypto and fintech coexist in India’s regulatory sites? The answer is not in a simple yes or no.

Think of them as two neighbors in the same city farm. Fintech-reliable, well-exerted residents trust everyone. Crypto is the new tenant—complicated, unconventional, but a little unexpected. The supervisory authorities are the leadership committee for society, which tries to maintain peace while stopping chaos. https://jioskill.com/agentic-ai-ai-powered-agents-the-next-big-shift-in-work-and-technology/

For India, the smartest road is coexistence of moving on. Fintech will grow with UPI, digital lending, and neobanks. Crypto can remain a niche but important player, especially as blockchain applications mature. And who knows? In ten years from now, both can merge into an economic ecosystem that feels comfortable, safe, and global.

Agentic AI & AI-Powered Agents: The Next Big Shift in Work and Technology

Q1. What is the difference between fintech and crypto in India?

Fintech refers to technology-driven financial services such as UPI payment, digital credit, neo-banking, and insurance technology, all of which work under direct regulation of RBI, SEBI, and other state bodies. On the other hand, crypto is built on decentralized blockchain technology and currently operates in a gray field in India—while not limited, there is a heavy tax (30% on profits and 1% on trades), and it lacks dedicated regulations.

Q2. Why is the crypto assessment more complex than fintech?

Unlike fintech, which works within traditional economic rules, crypto challenges the significant idea of ​​centralized control. Supervisors are concerned about the use of money laundering, tax evasion, and financial instability. India’s cautious approach—mimicking high taxes and limiting bank access to stock exchanges—is because the government wants to monitor the activity before considering mainstream. This makes the regulations more complex than fintech, which already fits into existing legal structures.

Q3. Can Fintech and Crypto cooperate under today’s rules in India?

Collaboration due to uncertainty is limited today. Fintech can easily integrate services such as crypto-based services such as cross-border payments, investment products, or blockchain-based lenders, but mostly avoids it because of unclear laws. Instead, RBI emphasizes a safe alternative—India’s central bank digital currency (CBDC)—which combines crypto’s innovation with regulated funding.

https://codexon.in/what-can-we-expect-from-influencer-marketing-in-2025/